send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Statement: “In the last two years, the Modi government has provided Rs. 40,000 crore for infrastructure development in Delhi,” Mr Gadkari said while addressing a two-day executive meeting of the Delhi BJP. Which of the following negates the above statement?
(i) Air pollution in Delhi is on the rise since past five years.
(ii) Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be inaugurating several highways in the next six months to free the city from traffic jams and pollution.
(iii)A survey by a private agency reveals that the average speed of traffic in Delhi have reduced by 20% over past three years while there has been no significant increase in the number of vehicles.
All except (iii)
Only (ii)
Only (iii)
Both (i) and (iii)
None of these
In this question, we have to choose and option which negates the facts provided in the statement. Option (i) is not a correct choice as there is no definite correlation between air pollution and infrastructural development. Some times better infrastructure leads to more air pollution by accommodating more vehicles on the roads. Option (ii) clearly supports the statement by pointing out that PM will be inaugurating many new highways in coming six months which could account for the use of funds mentioned in the statement. Option (iii) negates the statement as it points out the lack of road space in Delhi because average speed of traffic have reduced whereas the statement mentions that the government has spent 40k crores in infrastructure projects over last two years.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses