send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Consider the following statements regarding the recommendation made by the Karnataka Cabinet for a constitutional amendment
The Karnataka Cabinet has suggested amending Article 341 (3) to the Constitution to allow states to implement internal reservation policies among Scheduled Castes.
The A.J. Sadashiva Commission report on internal reservation was submitted in 2012 and was endorsed by the then government during its last days in power.
The Social Welfare Minister emphasized the need for Article 341 (3) to be inserted through an amendment for states to make adjustments to the reservation matrix.
How many of the above statements is/are correct?
Only One
Only Two
All Three
None
Only statements 1&3 are correct.
Statement 1 is correct: The Karnataka Cabinet has indeed recommended amending Article 341 (3) to allow states to implement internal reservation policies among Scheduled Castes.
Statement 2 is incorrect: The A.J. Sadashiva Commission report was submitted in 2012 but was closed by the then government during its last days in power.
Statement 3 is correct: The Social Welfare Minister emphasized the necessity of Article 341 (3) for states to make adjustments to the reservation matrix.
Internal Reservation in Karnataka
The Karnataka Cabinet's recommendation is centered around amending Article 341 (3) to facilitate internal reservation among Scheduled Castes.
The BJP government, before its exit, had closed the A.J. Sadashiva Commission report, which had proposed internal reservation under specific categories.
The Social Welfare Minister stressed the need for a constitutional amendment, citing the supremacy of Parliament in reservation matters.
Why in News?
The Karnataka Cabinet's recommendation for a constitutional amendment to address internal reservation issues among Scheduled Castes has significant implications for the state's political landscape. This move is crucial in the context of the upcoming Lok Sabha elections and reflects the nuanced dynamics surrounding reservation policies.
Hence option 2nd is correct.
By: Shubham Tiwari ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses