send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
In question, some statements are given, followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements. Indicate your answer.
Statements :
No grasshopper is an insect.
No insect is a bug. All bugs are moths.
Conclusions : I. Some bugs may be grasshoppers. II. All moths being insects is a possibility. III. No bug is a grasshopper.
Either I or III follows
I and III follow
Only I follows
All I, II and III follow
None of these
Analytical Method: Given Statements: No grasshopper is an insect. No insect is a bug. All bugs are moths. Given Conclusions: Some bugs may be grasshoppers. All moths being insects is a possibility. No bug is a grasshopper. Checking Conclusion 1 and 3: Some bugs may be grasshoppers & No bug is a grasshopper As we can observe that both S1 and S2 are E-type statements, the middle term ‘insect’ is distributed twice here. Therefore, we can’t define a definite relationship between these two classes. Clearly, possibilities do exist between ‘bug’ and ‘grasshopper’. This confirms that C1 follows but C3 doesn’t. Checking Conclusion 2: All moths being insects is a possibility. Using S3 and S2, we get Converse of S3 (All bugs are moths) + Converse of S2 (No insect is a bug) Some moths are bugs + No bug is an insect = Some moths are not insects Now, when some moths are already not insects, all moths being insects is not possible. C2, hence, doesn’t follow. Evidently, option C is the correct answer.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses