send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Section 5 and 6 of the Specific Relief Act are mutually exclusive statement is …
True
False
Partly Correct
None of the above
Correct Option: 2
Explanation: Section 5 and Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act are not mutually exclusive. Section 5 deals with the right to recover possession of immovable property, while Section 6 specifically provides a remedy for the unlawful possession of property, irrespective of the person's title to it. The two sections can be applied together in situations where possession of property has been wrongfully transferred. Hence, the statement that they are mutually exclusive is false. Both sections can be invoked for different aspects of property recovery and protection of possession.
By: Ajay Kumar abhimanu ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses