send mail to support@abhimanu.com mentioning your email id and mobileno registered with us! if details not recieved
Resend Opt after 60 Sec.
By Loging in you agree to Terms of Services and Privacy Policy
Claim your free MCQ
Please specify
Sorry for the inconvenience but we’re performing some maintenance at the moment. Website can be slow during this phase..
Please verify your mobile number
Login not allowed, Please logout from existing browser
Please update your name
Subscribe to Notifications
Stay updated with the latest Current affairs and other important updates regarding video Lectures, Test Schedules, live sessions etc..
Your Free user account at abhipedia has been created.
Remember, success is a journey, not a destination. Stay motivated and keep moving forward!
Refer & Earn
Enquire Now
My Abhipedia Earning
Kindly Login to view your earning
Support
Type your modal answer and submitt for approval
Any case regarding the violation of the fundamental rights of a citizen goes to High Court straight because:
This power has been granted by the Constitution
It is difficult to decide such cases in the lower courts
Subordinate courts may not be able to give impartial judgement
Quick decision can be obtained from the High Court
The Constitution empowers the Supreme Court and High Court with the duty to safeguard the Fundamental Rights of the citizens. The Supreme Court under Article 32 and High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution can issue Writs for the protection of Fundamental Rights. Any Person whose Fundamental Rights are violated can approach either of the courts. Although the Constitution also empowers the Parliament to extend this power of Supreme Court and High Court to any other Court or tribunal by making law in this regard. Hence option 1st is correct.
By: Parvesh Mehta ProfileResourcesReport error
Access to prime resources
New Courses