In 2003, if the number of female qualified candidates was 70, what was the respective ratio of number of female qualified candidates and number of male qualified candidates same year?

1. 5:9
2. 7:11
3. 10:11
4. 5:7

Explanation

Explanation :
28% of 600 = 168
Female candidates = 70
Male candidates = 168 – 70 = 98
=> 70:98
=> 5:7

What is the average number of candidates who did not qualify in the exam in the years 2003 and 2005?

1. 576
2. 556
3. 528
4. 546

Explanation

Explanation :
72% of 600 = 432
60% of 1040 = 624
432 + 624 = 1056 = 1056/2 = 528

In 2003, a total of 68 male candidates did qualify. What is the respective ratio between males and females who had qualified in 2003?

1. 11:25
2. 19:25
3. 17:25
4. 25:13

Explanation

Explanation :
28% of 600 = 168
Female Candidates = 168 – 68 = 100
68 : 100 => 17:25

In 2002, 54% of appeared candidates did qualify. How many female candidates did qualify in the exam?

1. 280
2. 170
3. 180
4. 250

Explanation

Explanation :
54% of 750 = 405
x = percent of qualified female candidates
x = (4/9)*405 = 180

In 2004, what percent of male candidates did qualify in the exam among all qualified candidates?

1. 51%
2. 61%
3. 55%
4. 56%

Explanation

Explanation :
x = percent of qualified male candidates
x = (8/13)*100 = 61%

In 2001, 6400 candidates appeared at the exam and 40% of them qualified. In 2005 the ratio between qualified males and females was 3:5. What is the total number of female candidates who qualified in these two years?

1. 1120
2. 1220
3. 1330
4. 1150

Explanation

Explanation :
x = Female candidates in 2001
40% of 6400 = 2560
(3/8)* of 2560 = 960
y = Female candidates in 2005
40% of 1040 = 416
y = (5/8)*416 =260
Total = 960 + 260 = 1220

By: Pranav Gupta