Multiple Choice Questions on In case of A K Gopalan v State of Madras the Preventive Detention Act 1950 was found conflicting wit........... for SEBI Grade A ( Officer) Exam Preparation

Constitution of India

Legal Stream (SEBI)

Title

45:30

Video Progress

8 of 24 completed

Notes Progress

5 of 15 completed

MCQs Progress

38 of 100 completed

Subjective Progress

8 of 20 completed

Continue to Next Topic

Indian Economy - Understanding the basics of Indian economic system

Next Topic

    In case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was found conflicting with the two Articles:

    Articles 14 and 17

    Incorrect Answer

    Articles 19 and 21

    Correct Answer

    Articles 23 and 25

    Incorrect Answer

    Articles 23 and 32.

    Incorrect Answer
    Explanation:

    - Option 1: Articles 14 and 17

    - Article 14 guarantees equal protection of the laws.

    - Article 17 abolishes untouchability.

    - Not relevant to the case.

    - Option 2: Articles 19 and 21

    - Correct Answer.

    - Article 19 discusses the protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, assembly, etc.

    - Article 21 provides that no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

    - The court examined if the Preventive Detention Act violated these rights.

    - Option 3: Articles 23 and 25

    - Article 23 prohibits traffic in human beings and forced labor.

    - Article 25 ensures freedom of conscience and free profession of religion.

    - Not relevant to the case.

    - Option 4: Articles 23 and 32

    - Article 23 again prohibits traffic in human beings and forced labor.

    - Article 32 provides the right to constitutional remedies.

    - Not relevant to this context.


    ProfileResources

    Download Abhipedia Android App

    Access to prime resources

    Downlod from playstore
    download android app download android app for free