Explanation:

Explanation:  Statement 1 is incorrect: Tilak set up his Home Rule League in April 1916 and it was restricted to Maharashtra (excluding Bombay city), Karnataka, Central Provinces and Berar. Supplementary notes: Tilak’s Home Rule League  Tilak set up his Home Rule League in April 1916 and it was restricted to Maharashtra (excluding Bombay city), Karnataka, Central Provinces and Berar.  It had six branches and the demands included swarajya, formation of linguistic states and education in the vernacular.  The Home Rule Movement was the Indian response to the First World War in a less charged but a more effective way than the response of Indians living abroad which took the form of the romantic Ghadr adventure.  Two Indian Home Rule Leagues were organised on the lines of the Irish Home Rule Leagues and they represented the emergence of a new trend of aggressive politics.  Annie Besant and Tilak were the pioneers of this new trend.  Both Tilak and Besant realised that the sanction of a Moderate-dominated Congress as well as full cooperation of the Extremists was essential for the movement to succeed.  Having failed at the 1914 session of the Congress to reach a Moderate-Extremist rapprochement, Tilak and Besant decided to revive political activity on their own.  By early 1915, Annie Besant had launched a campaign to demand self-government for India after the war on the lines of white colonies.  She campaigned through her newspapers, New India and Commonweal, and through public meetings and conferences.